Web 2.0 - Revision history

Nguyea32: /* Technical characteristics */

2009-04-13T01:49:57Z

Technical characteristics

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:49, 13 April 2009
Line 54:		Line 54:
	* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xhtml XHTML] : To display the content of web pages in a structured way.		* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xhtml XHTML] : To display the content of web pages in a structured way.

-	* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Css CSS 2.0] : To define the style of websites. Thus, it provides the customization of web pages.	+	* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Css CSS 2.0] : To define the style of websites. Thus, it provides the customization and personalization of web pages.

	* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javascript Javascript] : To improve interaction between users and interfaces.		* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Javascript Javascript] : To improve interaction between users and interfaces.
Line 60:		Line 60:
	* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xml XML]		* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xml XML]

-	* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rss RSS]	+	* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rss RSS]: Used to publish frequently updated works

	* [[Web Services ]]		* [[Web Services ]]

	* Using XML on HTTP in asynchronous mode Javascript is called « [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajax_(programming) Ajax] ».		* Using XML on HTTP in asynchronous mode Javascript is called « [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajax_(programming) Ajax] ».
-

	== Few Web 2.0 services ==		== Few Web 2.0 services ==

Nguyea32: /* External links */

2009-04-13T01:47:34Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 13 April 2009
Line 134:		Line 134:

	[http://www.secondlife.com second life]		[http://www.secondlife.com second life]
		+
	[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword Buzzword French wiki]		[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword Buzzword French wiki]
		+
		+
		+

	-- AQ [[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)		-- AQ [[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

Nguyea32: /* External links */

2009-04-13T01:47:09Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:47, 13 April 2009
Line 133:		Line 133:
	== External links ==		== External links ==

-	[http;//www.secondlife.com ~~seconde~~ life]	+	[http://www.secondlife.com second life]
-		+	[http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword Buzzword French wiki]

	-- AQ [[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)		-- AQ [[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

Nguyea32: /* External links */

2009-04-13T01:46:01Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 13 April 2009
Line 132:		Line 132:

	== External links ==		== External links ==
		+
		+	[http;//www.secondlife.com seconde life]


	-- AQ [[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)		-- AQ [[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

Nguyea32: /* External links */

2009-04-13T01:45:06Z

External links

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:45, 13 April 2009
Line 134:		Line 134:


-	--AQ[[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)	+	-- AQ [[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

Nguyea32 at 01:44, 13 April 2009

2009-04-13T01:44:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:44, 13 April 2009
Line 134:		Line 134:


-	--[[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 18:32, 2 April 2009 (EDT)~~Anh-Quan~~	+	--AQ[[User:Nguyea32\|Nguyea32]] 21:44, 12 April 2009 (EDT)

Nguyea32: /* Social issues */

2009-04-13T01:43:31Z

Social issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 13 April 2009
Line 93:		Line 93:

	According to O'Reilley ''Data is the Next Intel Inside'', it means that the semantic content of the data is the key point of Web 2.0. So, the major issues of Web 2.0 concern its data content.		According to O'Reilley ''Data is the Next Intel Inside'', it means that the semantic content of the data is the key point of Web 2.0. So, the major issues of Web 2.0 concern its data content.
		+

	Web 2.0 deals with a big privacy problem. The number of user of social networking website such as facebook is in a perpetual growth. Many people exposed there their private life. Even if these websites have some policies about privacy, It is easy to get some information about different people. Furthermore these websites provide interactions with other services which can access to your personal data for other purposes. It could be seen as a double-edged effect because purposes can be kind as well as malicious even if for the moment it is mainly marketing goals.		Web 2.0 deals with a big privacy problem. The number of user of social networking website such as facebook is in a perpetual growth. Many people exposed there their private life. Even if these websites have some policies about privacy, It is easy to get some information about different people. Furthermore these websites provide interactions with other services which can access to your personal data for other purposes. It could be seen as a double-edged effect because purposes can be kind as well as malicious even if for the moment it is mainly marketing goals.
		+

	Web 2.0 is specifically for users, and Users create the content of Web 2.0. This creation can be totally original which is very rare. Most of creations are in fact combinaison of several existing contents. As it is not simple to check the original source of the content, it is often difficult to check the real consistency of the data.		Web 2.0 is specifically for users, and Users create the content of Web 2.0. This creation can be totally original which is very rare. Most of creations are in fact combinaison of several existing contents. As it is not simple to check the original source of the content, it is often difficult to check the real consistency of the data.
		+

	With Web 2.0, by tagging and having a strong social network, people become the media. So, the resulting word of mouth is really powerful and fast. For instance, video of a promising singer could be tagged and seen by many people which could offer a big boost for the career of the singer. This effect could create a Buzz. It is rather difficult for the target of the buzz to control it. We have to be very careful of this phenomenon, because it can easily manipulate people's mind.		With Web 2.0, by tagging and having a strong social network, people become the media. So, the resulting word of mouth is really powerful and fast. For instance, video of a promising singer could be tagged and seen by many people which could offer a big boost for the career of the singer. This effect could create a Buzz. It is rather difficult for the target of the buzz to control it. We have to be very careful of this phenomenon, because it can easily manipulate people's mind.
Line 102:		Line 105:


-	Another important problem is the challenge between keeping standards and personalization. Because Web 2.0 is based on creativity and personalization, it is rather interesting to analyze how it can change standards in the education for instance.	+	Another important problem is the challenge between keeping standards and personalization. Because Web 2.0 is based on creativity and personalization, it is rather interesting to analyze how it can change standards in the education for instance. Students need some structure from teachers. However, social softwares such as "second life" provide them new strong sources of knowledge and new way of learning. So, the education should pay attention to these new methods and perhaps integrate them into their standard ones. Moreover, collaborative work became more important now with web 2.0, because it is easier to have advices from other people and to use information from other websites. As written previously contents of Web 2.0 pages are often based of other contents. So, it is a priority to teach learners how to choose and aknowledge their sources and make them aware about property rights, copyright, and plagiarism.

	== References ==		== References ==

Nguyea32: /* Social issues */

2009-04-12T02:37:59Z

Social issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 12 April 2009
Line 94:		Line 94:
	According to O'Reilley ''Data is the Next Intel Inside'', it means that the semantic content of the data is the key point of Web 2.0. So, the major issues of Web 2.0 concern its data content.		According to O'Reilley ''Data is the Next Intel Inside'', it means that the semantic content of the data is the key point of Web 2.0. So, the major issues of Web 2.0 concern its data content.

-	Web 2.0 deals with a big privacy problem. The number of user of social networking website such as facebook is in a perpetual growth. Many people exposed there their private life. Even if these websites have some policies about privacy. It is easy to get some information about different people. Furthermore these websites provide interactions with other services which can access to your personal data for other purposes. It could be seen as a double-edged effect because purposes can be kind as well as malicious even if for the moment it is mainly marketing goals.	+	Web 2.0 deals with a big privacy problem. The number of user of social networking website such as facebook is in a perpetual growth. Many people exposed there their private life. Even if these websites have some policies about privacy, It is easy to get some information about different people. Furthermore these websites provide interactions with other services which can access to your personal data for other purposes. It could be seen as a double-edged effect because purposes can be kind as well as malicious even if for the moment it is mainly marketing goals.

	Web 2.0 is specifically for users, and Users create the content of Web 2.0. This creation can be totally original which is very rare. Most of creations are in fact combinaison of several existing contents. As it is not simple to check the original source of the content, it is often difficult to check the real consistency of the data.		Web 2.0 is specifically for users, and Users create the content of Web 2.0. This creation can be totally original which is very rare. Most of creations are in fact combinaison of several existing contents. As it is not simple to check the original source of the content, it is often difficult to check the real consistency of the data.

-	With Web 2.0, by tagging and having a strong social network, people become the media. So, the resulting word of mouth is really powerful and fast. For instance, video of a promising singer could be tagged and seen by many people which could offer a big boost for the career of the singer. This effect could create a Buzz	+	With Web 2.0, by tagging and having a strong social network, people become the media. So, the resulting word of mouth is really powerful and fast. For instance, video of a promising singer could be tagged and seen by many people which could offer a big boost for the career of the singer. This effect could create a Buzz. It is rather difficult for the target of the buzz to control it. We have to be very careful of this phenomenon, because it can easily manipulate people's mind.
		+	Marketers really pay attention to this, because a buzz is a strong advertisement for them. So, for them, create the buzz and maintain it is considered as jackpot. A good example of marketing buzz is the Iphone.
		+

	Another important problem is the challenge between keeping standards and personalization. Because Web 2.0 is based on creativity and personalization, it is rather interesting to analyze how it can change standards in the education for instance.		Another important problem is the challenge between keeping standards and personalization. Because Web 2.0 is based on creativity and personalization, it is rather interesting to analyze how it can change standards in the education for instance.

Nguyea32: /* References */

2009-04-12T02:24:52Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:24, 12 April 2009
Line 113:		Line 113:

	[http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html O'Reilley What is web 2.0?]		[http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html O'Reilley What is web 2.0?]
		+
		+	[http://www.social-marketing.com/blog/2007/09/why-web-20-matters-to-social-marketers.html Why web 2.0 matters to social marketers]
		+
		+	[http://www.thejournal.com/articles/22454_6 crossroad in education: issues for Web 2.0]

	== See also ==		== See also ==

Nguyea32: /* Social issues */

2009-04-12T02:22:41Z

Social issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 12 April 2009
Line 91:		Line 91:

	== Social issues ==		== Social issues ==
		+
		+	According to O'Reilley ''Data is the Next Intel Inside'', it means that the semantic content of the data is the key point of Web 2.0. So, the major issues of Web 2.0 concern its data content.
		+
		+	Web 2.0 deals with a big privacy problem. The number of user of social networking website such as facebook is in a perpetual growth. Many people exposed there their private life. Even if these websites have some policies about privacy. It is easy to get some information about different people. Furthermore these websites provide interactions with other services which can access to your personal data for other purposes. It could be seen as a double-edged effect because purposes can be kind as well as malicious even if for the moment it is mainly marketing goals.
		+
		+	Web 2.0 is specifically for users, and Users create the content of Web 2.0. This creation can be totally original which is very rare. Most of creations are in fact combinaison of several existing contents. As it is not simple to check the original source of the content, it is often difficult to check the real consistency of the data.
		+
		+	With Web 2.0, by tagging and having a strong social network, people become the media. So, the resulting word of mouth is really powerful and fast. For instance, video of a promising singer could be tagged and seen by many people which could offer a big boost for the career of the singer. This effect could create a Buzz
		+
		+	Another important problem is the challenge between keeping standards and personalization. Because Web 2.0 is based on creativity and personalization, it is rather interesting to analyze how it can change standards in the education for instance.

	== References ==		== References ==